Look, I am no fan of Twilight. I think it's pulpy drivel -- and if you like pulpy drivel to relax to, I don't care. But it must be acknowledged as such. I have real problems with anyone who thinks that this is good literature, or anything close to the Gothic wonders that are the Brontes. It's a G-rated Harlequin, and nothing more. Nor do I like much of what Twilight espouses. I think Bella is a drip, and I think Breaking Dawn was a medieval throwback, complete with pregnant teenager and arranged / imprinted marriage. It's messed up, and would be disturbing even if written by Anne Rice, though arguably it would be sold to an audience better prepared for a mindfuck of grossness.
However ... I found myself defending it, and even defending Bella, because I have real issues with 20-something men insisting that it's detrimental to young women, sets them up to expect "too much" out of men, and will ultimately render them into mindless creatures who only live to do a man's bidding.
It's weird, because I had a discussion with an older man and completely agreed with him that the series is upholding outdated fairy tale values, and encourages girls to love "the bad boy." (I'm uncertain that Edward Cullen is a bad boy, he strikes me as a bit foppish, but I may have different standards of badness.) But his perspective is also coming from a different place -- he's a father of a daughter, for one, and an avowed feminist.
Perhaps it's a bit ageist and sexist of me, but I'm disturbed by the 20-something (and younger!) men who are getting up on a soapbox about Twilight. It's not as though men can't be feminists (I just cited one) and I don't welcome and encourage their opinion in such matters. But there's something very icky about young men telling young women what they should or should not fantasize about. I don't think its their place. Part of it is personal -- I find that many of these young men are silent or snarky when it comes to championing women in other fictional or professional contexts. Many of them are the first to chortle over some T&A. But it's also a matter of age and experience. I think it's something that a man can only offer commentary on if he has a certain kind of experience, or more familiarity with women, and women's literature.
Much of the criticism stems from a firmly held belief that young women are mindless sponges who will absorb Twilight, and reenact it in their own lives. They believe that young women are incapable of seperating fact from fantasy, and that they'll be abused or alone because they want an Edward Cullen. Sometimes, I get the impression from their complaints that alone will be worse -- and that much of the rage stems from the fact that girls might not want to date them, because they're not Edward.
My point has and continues to be this -- girls have more brains than men are giving them credit for. We've been reading fairy tales and romance novels for years. Centuries, even. The majority of them portray woman as simpering things, unable to survive without a man, and many of them feature dangerous men. The women who have read them have gone on to live successful, rich, and normal lives. Hell, the eras that taught these submissive traits managed to produce kick-ass and subversive women.
Girls read books like Twilight because it's elevated fantasy. They know it's not real, they know boys like Edward Cullen don't exist. That's the whole point. That's why girls have lusted for Heathcliff, Rochester, Mr. Darcy, Sir Lancelot, and gosh knows who else. We all know Heathcliff is a psychotic, sadistic bastard who you wouldn't want to meet in a dark alley, let alone a bedroom. The point is that he's safely contained on paper, and you can engage in wishful thinking -- if only you had been Cathy, you'd never have thrown him over, and he would have never gone off the deep end.

One also needs to look at the "bodice-ripper" genre as a whole. Some of it is disturbing stuff, bordering on a rape fantasy, or the idea that if a man does rape you, it's because he really really likes you. A lot of men have taken the "She means no, but she really means yes" scenes of a Fabio novel to be literal truth. A lot of women probably have too, hence the doubt that begins to seep in. "Maybe I was asking for it ..." I don't see men arguing for the danger of such scenes -- in fact, when you bring them up as evidence, they don't seem to know of their existence. Or they dismiss them as something intended for a mature audience, refusing to accept that a lot of girls do read them as pre-teens or teenagers.
But what about the pervasiveness of Twilight? Surely no book has ever been so widely read and thus consumed by girls who don't know any better. I'm not sure about that. If you could import The Bridges of Madison County, Jean Auel's The Clan of the Cave Bear series, or The Thorn Birds to an Internet-driven fandom, you might see something very similar spring up. They were all very popular in their day -- and the latter are particularly troubling if you really want to pull them apart. Sure, Jean Auel penned Ayla, the feminist cave woman who invented like, everything -- but once Jondalar walked in, Ayla stopped inventing, made tea, and slept with him. A lot. The books weren't about skinning hides anymore, they were all about what you could do on skinned hides. Jondalar was also the most unrealistic hero ever -- a pre-history man who was all about equal rights for women, ridiculously handsome, clean, and gifted, if you know what I mean. And I think you do. Like that hasn't set unrealistic expectations for every girl who came of age in the 1980s.

This guy, only mixed with this:
But ten times more perfect because he can make canoes, sculpt, and is ... well, you know. Gifted.Let's talk about The Thorn Birds too. Father Ralph de Bricassart was Collen McCullough's Edward Cullen -- beautiful, unobtainable, chaste, brooding, flawed. He also imprinted on Maggie at six or seven. The book is one big tragedy on what happens when you fall for Mr.Can't-Have-Him-Because-He's-A-Priest, but try to find a man like him and ... yeah. It's not a happy story. But women don't read it because they want it to happen to them and while they might sigh at Father Ralph, I don't think any girl decided they would hold out for a Catholic priest.
Were these books intended for mature audiences? Yes. But every girl 13 or older snuck them off the shelf, so don't give me that. We start finding the naughty stuff very early.
Girls who are curious about boys are going to take this from the shelf. They may not like it, but they're going to pick it up.It's also why, when we look to fantasy, we often gravitate towards the pulp. I love a strong, female character -- and I can project myself into one. But the reason so many romance heroines are thinly penned is because they're just Viewmasters for the girls reading them. Take your Harlequin novels. We're always told the heroine is a spunky, literate, feminist ... but all that goes out the window when she meets that immortal Scotsmen, gets kidnapped by pirates or Vikings, or sees the man with no name walk into town. She never looks at a book again, and her life becomes consumed by the well-endowed hero. These books are just an excuse to hop to the sex scenes -- Twilight just stretched out "the boring bits," the obsession, and the foreplay for four freaking books. But they're also an excuse to put yourself into the story and imbue the heroine with your own characteristics. That's why so many girls think Bella is a great character -- they are Bella. The traits they imagine her to have are actually theirs. One day, they'll realize it.
I have confidence they will, too. What young men don't understand is that girls need different fantasies for different periods of their lives ... hell, for different days of their week. Sometimes they need to feel strong, and sometimes they want to feel weak, and have someone save them. It's like that old U2 song Stories For Boys:
It's not something that changes with age, either. I don't think women watch The Last of the Mohicans and become fixated on Hawkeye to the point of insanity. Though you couldn't blame them if they did:
As I said earlier, I recognize that my crushes are driven by very specific issues I have. Some punks might think they're dangerous. I've certainly gotten the "You need to lower your expectations" speech a few times, to which I shrug and suggest they grow a pair of balls, and try to meet them instead. Halfway would be nice. Dirty Harry Callahan and Bud White doesn't leave a girl to walk the ghetto streets alone, and they don't disappear when the dinner bill comes.

Will there be women who really mess themselves up thanks to Twilight? Possibly. But I have no doubt they are women who already had issues, poor self-esteem, and no encouragement to be strong, independent individuals. If they hadn't found Twilight, they would have found something else that confirmed and crystallized it all for them. Yes, if there had been a strong alternative for them to follow, they might have been saved -- but there are examples. I think Elizabeth Swann was a recent bit of kick-assery that appealed to the same demographic. Whip It was too. Even Twilight has managed to lead girls into Wuthering Heights and Jane Eyre, and Jane is certainly an example of a woman who goes for "the bad boy" and retains her own sense of self. (Even bipolar Cathy did what she wanted, Heathcliff and Linton be damned.) But a girl will be what she will be ... and while you can try to guide her to the things that will matter, she'll choose her own lifepath, for better or for worse. Choices are what feminism is all about, after all, and you can't force her to make one.
However, it would seem that there are young men out there who would like to make it for them. Again, I don't want to say that men can't have their opinion about wholesome fantasies and literature -- but I don't know if it's valid. I certainly don't think it is while they preach against Bella when New Moon hits theaters, but praise Megan Fox as harmless eye candy. You can't damn Bella for not having any interests outside of Edward Cullen, and then idolize the pin-ups who do it all for the male gaze. It's apples to apples, lads, and you better start tearing it all down if you really want to give girls and boys realistic and wholesome expectations.


















































